Advertisement
Small pockets have always been a source of frustration for women who have to carry essentials like phones, wallets, and keys.
Despite the fashion industry’s progress in designing more practical clothing for women, it seems that small pockets continue to be the norm in women’s pants and shorts.
But why are they so small? In this article, we explore the history behind the pocket gender gap and the reasons why small pockets have become the norm in women’s fashion.
Advertisement
The Pocket Gender Gap
The pocket gender gap refers to the discrepancy between the size and functionality of pockets in men’s and women’s clothing. While men’s pants and shorts often have large, deep pockets that can fit a variety of items, women’s pockets are typically smaller and less practical. This gap is not a new phenomenon – it has been around since the 18th century, when women’s clothing became more fitted and fashionable.
Gender Inequality in Fashion
One reason for the pocket gender gap is the fashion industry’s gender inequality. Historically, women’s clothing has been designed to emphasize aesthetics over functionality. Women were expected to carry purses and handbags, which were seen as symbols of femininity and wealth. As a result, pockets were deemed unnecessary and even undesirable in women’s clothing. This cultural bias against women’s pockets has persisted through the centuries and continues to influence fashion designers today.
The Industrial Revolution
The Industrial Revolution played a significant role in the pocket gender gap. As mass production became more common, clothing manufacturers began to prioritize efficiency over practicality. Smaller pockets were easier and faster to produce, and they required less fabric, which saved costs. Women’s clothing was no exception, and designers started to create smaller pockets to save time and money.
Changing Attitudes Towards Women’s Clothing
In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the pocket gender gap and its implications for gender equality. Many people have spoken out against the bias in women’s clothing and have called for more practical designs. Some fashion brands have responded by creating more functional and stylish pockets for women’s clothing. However, the pocket gender gap persists, and small pockets remain the norm in many women’s pants and shorts.
Closing the Pocket Gender Gap
Closing the pocket gender gap will require a shift in cultural attitudes towards women’s clothing. It will also require the fashion industry to prioritize practicality and functionality over aesthetics. By creating more functional and stylish pockets in women’s clothing, designers can help to eliminate the bias against women’s pockets and promote gender equality.
Conclusion
Small pockets in women’s pants and shorts are not just an inconvenience – they are a symptom of a larger cultural bias against women’s clothing. While the pocket gender gap has existed for centuries, there is hope for change. By raising awareness of the issue and advocating for more practical designs, we can work towards a future where women’s clothing is both fashionable and functional.
